Alexander, Ricky v. Dodge Correctional Institution
Ricky N. Alexander |
Dodge Correctional Institution |
3:2014cv00849 |
December 9, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Grant |
Stephen L. Crocker |
James D. Peterson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 81 ORDER on ifp request: Trust Fund Account Statement due 10/27/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 10/6/2017. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 71 ORDER denying plaintiff's 66 Motion for Reconsideration and denying plaintiff's 65 Motion to deny counsel's request to depose plaintiff. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 8/24/2017. (elc),(ps) |
Filing 64 JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case. Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 3/13/2017. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 32 ORDER denying 31 Motion to Reassign Case. Plaintiff may have until June 15, 2016, to file an amended complaint. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 5/25/2016. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 30 ORDER granting in part 27 motion for reconsideration. The judgment entered in this case, Dkt. 11 , is VACATED, and the strike recorded against plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) is RESCINDED. Plaintiff may have until May 19, 2016, to file an amended complaint against the defendants who discriminated against him. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 4/28/2016. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 26 ORDER denying 25 motion to deem the district court decision as void and request for recusal. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 3/3/2016. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 24 ORDER denying plaintiff's 22 , 23 Motion for Assistance in Recruiting Counsel. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 1/19/2016. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 21 ORDER denying plaintiff's 18 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 12/22/2015. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 11 JUDGMENT entered denying plaintiff leave to proceed and dismissing this case for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (PAO/jef). (jef),(ps) |
Filing 5 ORDER Assessing Initial partial filing fee of $ 52.69. Initial partial filing fee due 1/12/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 12/23/2014. (elc),(ps) |
Filing 3 ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff to submit Trust fund account statement. Trust Fund Account Statement due 1/5/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 12/15/2014. (jef),(ps) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Alexander, Ricky v. Dodge Correctional Institution | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ricky N. Alexander | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Dodge Correctional Institution | |
Represented By: | Corey Francis Finkelmeyer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.