University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics Authority v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics Authority |
Aetna Life Insurance Company, Aetna Health and Life Insurance Company and Aetna Health Insurance Company |
3:2014cv00882 |
December 18, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Dane |
Barbara B. Crabb |
Stephen L. Crocker |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendants Aetna Health Insurance Company, Aetna Health and Life Insurance Company, Aetna Life Insurance Company, Kay Kay Realty Corp. Flexible Benefit Plan dismissing the case. (voc ) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics Authority may have untilApril 3, 2015 to amend its complaint and plead claims under ERISA. If plaintiff fails to do so, the case will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 3/11/2015. (voc) |
Filing 4 ORDER of Recusal. District Judge James D. Peterson recused. Case reassigned to District Judge Barbara B. Crabb for all further proceedings. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 1/8/2015. (voc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.