University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics Authority v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics Authority
Defendant: Aetna Life Insurance Company, Aetna Health and Life Insurance Company and Aetna Health Insurance Company
Case Number: 3:2014cv00882
Filed: December 18, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
County: Dane
Presiding Judge: Barbara B. Crabb
Presiding Judge: Stephen L. Crocker
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 42 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendants Aetna Health Insurance Company, Aetna Health and Life Insurance Company, Aetna Life Insurance Company, Kay Kay Realty Corp. Flexible Benefit Plan dismissing the case. (voc )
March 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics Authority may have untilApril 3, 2015 to amend its complaint and plead claims under ERISA. If plaintiff fails to do so, the case will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 3/11/2015. (voc)
January 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER of Recusal. District Judge James D. Peterson recused. Case reassigned to District Judge Barbara B. Crabb for all further proceedings. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 1/8/2015. (voc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics Authority v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics Authority
Represented By: Nicole Nannette Schrier
Represented By: Mark S. Sweet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aetna Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Brett Wortman Barnett
Represented By: Jeffrey C. Clark
Represented By: Mark Warren Hancock
Represented By: Todd G. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aetna Health and Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Brett Wortman Barnett
Represented By: Jeffrey C. Clark
Represented By: Mark Warren Hancock
Represented By: Todd G. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aetna Health Insurance Company
Represented By: Brett Wortman Barnett
Represented By: Jeffrey C. Clark
Represented By: Mark Warren Hancock
Represented By: Todd G. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?