United States of America v. Drach, Paul et al
| United States of America |
| Paul A. Drach, Kathleen A. Drach and BMO Harris Bank, National Association |
| 3:2015cv00184 |
| March 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Wood |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 IRS: Tax Liability |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 23 Motion for Reconsideration and vacating the 22 order dismissing this action. This action is STAYED by operation of law under 11 U.S.C. § 362, and the clerk of court is directed to administratively close this case. Defenda nts Paul and Kathleen Drach are further DIRECTED to advise the court when their bankruptcy case is closed or dismissed, or when discharge is entered, whichever is first. At that point, the United States may seek to reopen this action, if appropriate. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 4/4/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice subject to its reopening upon the completion of bankruptcy proceedings where all issues have not been rendered fully dispositive. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any order to reopen shall place this case at the head of the docket for immediate judicial attention. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 3/23/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
