Ibeagwa, Christian v. United States of America Internal Revenue Service

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Wisconsin Western District Ibeagwa, Christian v. United States of America Internal Revenue Service

Ibeagwa, Christian v. United States of America Internal Revenue Service

Plaintiff:	Christian C. Ibeagwa
Defendant:	United States of America Internal Revenue Service
Case Number:	3:2015cv00289
Filed:	May 13, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office:	Madison Office
County:	Dane
Presiding Judge:	Barbara B. Crabb
Presiding Judge:	Stephen L. Crocker
Nature of Suit:	Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action:	26 U.S.C. § 6672
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 8, 2016	Filing 24 ORDER regarding the stay. If the tax court has not issued a decision by April 11, 2016, the government should provide another status update. If the tax court issues a decision before then, either party may notify the court. If neither party responds by April 11, 2016, I will lift the stay. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 2/8/2016. (jef),(ps) Modified docket text on 2/8/2016 (jef).
November 13, 2015	Filing 22 ORDER that defendant United States of America's motion for a stay, dkt.# 16 , is GRANTED. No later than February 1, 2016, defendant should inform this court of the status of the proceedings in tax court. If the tax court issues a decision before that date, either party may notify this court of that fact. If defendant does not respond by February 1, 2016, I will lift the stay. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 11/13/2015. (jef),(ps)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 8, 2016

Filing 24 ORDER regarding the stay. If the tax court has not issued a decision by April 11, 2016, the government should provide another status update. If the tax court issues a decision before then, either party may notify the court. If neither party responds by April 11, 2016, I will lift the stay. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 2/8/2016. (jef),(ps) Modified docket text on 2/8/2016 (jef).

November 13, 2015

Filing 22 ORDER that defendant United States of America's motion for a stay, dkt.# 16 , is GRANTED. No later than February 1, 2016, defendant should inform this court of the status of the proceedings in tax court. If the tax court issues a decision before that date, either party may notify this court of that fact. If defendant does not respond by February 1, 2016, I will lift the stay. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 11/13/2015. (jef),(ps)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ibeagwa, Christian v. United States of America Internal Revenue Service
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christian C. Ibeagwa
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America Internal Revenue Service
Represented By:	Richard Davis Humphrey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?