Hayes, Kareen v. Dept. of Corrections et al
Kareen Hayes |
Dept. of Corrections, Ms. Suter, Ms. Anderson, Ms. Plasch and Ms. Lampman |
3:2022cv00574 |
October 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Stephen L Crocker |
James D Peterson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Clerk's Office response to #6 plaintiff's request for copies enclosing Complaint. (lam),(ps) |
Filing 6 Letter Requesting Copies by Plaintiff Kareen Hayes. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (lam),(ps) |
Filing 5 Warden PLRA Letter. (lam),(ps) |
Partial Filing fee received: $1.99, receipt number 75. (lam),(ps) |
Filing 4 ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 1.99 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 11/8/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 10/18/2022. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff Kareen Hayes. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jef),(ps) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/18/2022: #2 IPP Calculation) (jef). |
Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Kareen Hayes. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Kareen Hayes. (Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (jef),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.