Weir Minerals Australia Ltd v. Megatrol Inc et al

Plaintiff: Weir Minerals Australia Ltd
Defendant: Megatrol Inc and Flowtech Systems Inc
Case Number: 2:2011cv00352
Filed: November 10, 2011
Court: Wyoming District Court
Office: Cheyenne Office
County: Outside US
Presiding Judge: Alan B Johnson
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wyoming District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weir Minerals Australia Ltd v. Megatrol Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Weir Minerals Australia Ltd
Represented By: Kate M Fox
Represented By: Daniel T Conrad
Represented By: Leland I Gardner
Represented By: Mark G Paulson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Megatrol Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Flowtech Systems Inc
Represented By: Tyler John Garrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.