Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 152,307
Moreno-Suarez v. Garland
as 24-3220
Petitioner: YAMILE MARIA MORENO-SUAREZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Spengler v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3219
Plaintiff: MICHAEL R. SPENGLER
Defendant: FREDERICK D. WILLIAMS, Dr.; individual capacity, ZUNIGA, Ms.; individual capacity, HIMAYA, RN; individual capacity and others
Medrano Saenz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3200
Petitioner: YENY ARELY MEDRANO SAENZ and ZACHARY JOSHUA ARGUETA MEDRANO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Fegan v. Matterson
as 24-3210
Petitioner: STEPHEN FEGAN
Respondent: GISELLE MATTERSON
Dailey v. Sherman
as 24-3198
Petitioner: JAMES DAILEY
Respondent: STUART SHERMAN, Warden
Ramos Cano, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3211
Petitioner: ANA LETICIA RAMOS CANO, ARELI HERRERA RAMOS and JUAN HERRERA RAMOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Depape
as 24-3191
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DAVID WAYNE DEPAPE
American Medical Response of Inland Empire v. County of San Bernardino, et al.
as 24-3195
Plaintiff: AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE OF INLAND EMPIRE
Defendant: COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a California municipal corporation, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, an elected body, INLAND COUNTIES EMERGENCY MEDICAL AGENCY, a local emergency medical services agency and others
C. v. Directors Guild of America - Producer Health Plan
as 24-3203
Plaintiff: DAN C.
Defendant: DIRECTORS GUILD OF AMERICA - PRODUCER HEALTH PLAN
Orgain, Inc. v. Northern Innovations Holding Corp., et al.
as 24-3214
Plaintiff: ORGAIN, INC.
Defendant: NORTHERN INNOVATIONS HOLDING CORP., a Canadian Corporation doing business as Purely Inspired, LAKESIDE INNOVATIONS HOLDING CORP., a Canadian Corporation, IOVATE HEALTH SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Canadian Corporation and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?