Cases 1 - 10 of 1,264
KANDI BAR LLC v. SHENZHEN XIANGSHA NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD et al
as 1:2024cv01393
Plaintiff:
KANDI BAR LLC
Defendant:
SHENZHEN XIANGSHA NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD and CHEN XIAOLI
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
KANDI BAR LLC v. WUHAN YIKENAN TRADING CO., LTD et al
as 1:2024cv01395
Plaintiff:
KANDI BAR LLC
Defendant:
WUHAN YIKENAN TRADING CO., LTD and LUO DAN
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL v. APOLLONIA RACZ
as 1:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
THE PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL
Defendant:
JUDIT APOLLNIA RCZ
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
INTRALOT, INC. v. INSTANT WIN GAMING LIMITED
as 1:2024cv01189
Plaintiff:
Intralot, Inc.
Defendant:
Instant Win Gaming Limited
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01165
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Hodings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
WARREN COMMUNICATIONS NEWS, INC. v. NNR GLOBAL LOGISTICS USA, INC.
as 1:2024cv00955
Plaintiff:
WARREN COMMUNICATIONS NEWS, INC.
Defendant:
NNR GLOBAL LOGISTICS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
RADIC v. AUTOS DRIVE AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
IVAN RADIC
Defendant:
AUTOS DRIVE AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
LIPSET v. AL JAZEERA INTERNATIONAL (USA) LLC
as 1:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
BRENNA LIPSET
Defendant:
AL JAZEERA INTERNATIONAL (USA) LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
DISTRICT MOVING COMPANIES, INC. v. DISTRICT MOVERS, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT MOVING COMPANIES, INC.
Defendant:
DISTRICT MOVERS, LLC and DISTRICT RELOCATORS MOVING COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
