Cases 71 - 80 of 309
Shipping and Transit, LLC v. Choxi.com, Inc.
as 9:2015cv81032
Plaintiff:
Shipping and Transit, LLC
Defendant:
Choxi.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Gucci America, Inc. v. JRP Group Investments, LLC et al
as 0:2015cv61456
Plaintiff:
Gucci America, Inc.
Defendant:
JRP Group Investments, LLC , JRP Group, Incorporated , Xotshoes.Com Corp., and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Frey v. Adidas America, Inc.
as 0:2015cv61364
Plaintiff:
Fred Frey
Defendant:
Adidas America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Shipping and Transit, LLC v. Load Delivered Logistics, LLC
as 0:2015cv61331
Plaintiff:
Shipping and Transit, LLC
Defendant:
Load Delivered Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Tactical Medical Solutions, Inc. v. Aspire Sales, LLC
as 9:2015cv80860
Plaintiff:
Tactical Medical Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Aspire Sales LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
S.A.S. Jean Cassegrain et al v. longchampforsales.com et al
as 0:2015cv61217
Plaintiff:
S.A.S. Jean Cassegrain and Longchamp USA, Inc.
Defendant:
longchampforsales.com, ebagmarket.com, lcbagsvip.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
BLACK v. ACE-CLASSES.COM, INC.
as 0:2015cv61121
Plaintiff:
RONALD BLACK
Defendant:
ACE-CLASSES.COM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Shipping and Transit, LLC v. Caviar, Inc.
as 9:2015cv80616
Plaintiff:
Shipping and Transit, LLC
Defendant:
Caviar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Chanel, Inc. v. 2015 fashion accessories et al
as 0:2015cv60924
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
2015 fashion accessories, 2015and 518, fancy online and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Audemars Piguet Holding SA et al v. chinaone886 et al
as 0:2015cv60861
Defendant:
jojoni01, doujiaowolaoda888, comemoney2014 and others
Plaintiff:
Chopard (USA), Ltd., Henri Stern Watch Agency, Inc., Omega SA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
