Cases 1 - 10 of 849
Rose v. Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
as 0:2023mc62400
Plaintiff:
William Rose
Defendant:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Material Witne:
KPMG, LLP
Intervenor:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Beckwith v. Northeastern Health Group Inc.
as 0:2023cv62387
Plaintiff:
Kristy Beckwith
Defendant:
Northeastern Health Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Virani et al v. Bafna et al
as 0:2023cv62110
Defendant:
Kaif Hamid, Priyank Bafna, BP Watches and Electronics Co LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Adnan Virani, Junaid Hammed, World of Space LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv81812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv61952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv61888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
