Cases 1 - 10 of 895
Andrus v. Commission of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Troy K Andrus
Defendant:
Commission of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McKinney v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Scott Joseph McKinney
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Amerson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Joel Lynn Amerson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Myers v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Clarence Everett Myers
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Upshaw v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Andreha Nicole Upshaw
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00130
Petitioner:
Dawn Louise Moon
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Logston v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Brandy Carole Logston
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Devenney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00222
Petitioner:
Wendy Sune Devenney
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Benson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Nicole R. Benson
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Downs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Michele Downs
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
