Tenth Circuit Intellectual Property Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,374
Overhead Solutions, Inc. v. A1 Garage Door Service LLC
as 1:2019cv01741
Defendant:
A1 Garage Door Service LLC
Plaintiff:
Overhead Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
LRAD Corporation v. Argo-A Security
as 2:2019cv00402
Plaintiff:
LRAD Corporation
Defendant:
Argo-A Security
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
CUCU Inc v. Slickwraps Inc
as 2:2019cv00119
Defendant:
Slickwraps Inc
Plaintiff:
CUCU Inc
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Kamstrup A/S v. Axima Metering UAB
as 1:2019cv01668
Plaintiff:
Kamstrup A/S
Defendant:
Axima Metering UAB
Cause Of Action: (35:101 Patent Infringement)
Inventergy LBS, LLC v. Spot LLC
as 1:2019cv01670
Plaintiff:
Inventergy LBS, LLC
Defendant:
Spot LLC
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Kamstrup A/S v. Axioma Metering UAB
as 1:2019cv01669
Plaintiff:
Kamstrup A/S
Defendant:
Axioma Metering UAB
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.8.47.7
as 1:2019cv01679
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 7
Cause Of Action: Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.172.144.31
as 1:2019cv01680
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.172.144.31
Cause Of Action: Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.176.40.226
as 1:2019cv01681
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.176.40.226
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.243.194.171
as 1:2019cv01683
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.243.194.171
Cause Of Action: Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
