US District Court for the District of Kansas Other Statutes Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 114
Meeds v. Time Warner, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02372
Plaintiff:
Matthew Meeds, Matthew Meeds and Matthew Meeds
Defendant:
Time Warner, Inc. and Time Warner Cable, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Valencia v. Arctic Glacier Income Fund et al
as 2:2008cv02138
Plaintiff:
Jenifer Valencia and Jenifer Valencia
Defendant:
Arctic Glacier Income Fund, Arctic Glacier Inc., Arctic Glacier International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Getz v. LG Philips LCD Company LTD et al
as 5:2007cv04034
Plaintiff:
R Rex Getz
Defendant:
LG Philips LCD Company LTD, LG Philips LCD America, Inc., LG Electronics Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Watson v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 5:2007cv04033
Plaintiff:
James T Watson and James T Watson
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Srimoungchanh v. LG Philips LCD Co., Ltd et al
as 2:2007cv02107
Plaintiff:
Kou Srimoungchanh and Kou Srimoungchanh
Defendant:
LG Philips LCD Co., Ltd, LG Philips LCD America, Inc, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Srimoungchanh v. Nvidia Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv02106
Plaintiff:
Kou Srimoungchanh and Kou Srimoungchanh
Defendant:
Nvidia Corporation, Nvidia Corporation, ATI Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Coyle v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv02088
Plaintiff:
Peter Coyle and Peter Coyle
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co, Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Redpath v. Nividia Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv02067
Plaintiff:
Scott Redpath
Defendant:
Nividia Corporation, Nividia Corporation, ATI Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Van Dyk v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation et al
as 5:2007cv04010
Plaintiff:
Dustin Van Dyk
Defendant:
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu Limited, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
