US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Real Property Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 189
BELL et al v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
as 4:2014cv00291
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA BELL , HARRISON SMITH, JR and SAMANTHA BARKER
Defendant:
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUKSE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 3:2014cv00236
Plaintiff:
MOLLY RUKSE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WAL-MART STORES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRIVILEGE UNDERWRITERS RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE et al v. BRASSCRAFT MANUFACTURING COMPANY
as 3:2014cv00129
Plaintiff:
PRIVILEGE UNDERWRITERS RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE and NEIL THALL
Defendant:
BRASSCRAFT MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AUMILLER v. COCA-COLA COMPANY et al
as 4:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
BRISTOL I AUMILLER
Defendant:
COCA-COLA COMPANY and COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATHEWS v. WALGREEN CO
as 4:2013cv00677
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E MATHEWS
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
ANDERSON v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC
as 3:2013cv00554
Plaintiff:
MELISSA ANDERSON
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEEN, et al v BIOMET INC, et al
as 3:2012cv00519
Plaintiff:
JOAN MARIANNE KEEN and GEORGE E KEEN
Defendant:
BIOMET INC, BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS LLC, BIOMET FAIR LAWN LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LINTON v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO et al
as 5:2012cv00009
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H LINTON
Defendant:
SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO and ICON HEALTH AND FITNESS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMMONS v INTEREK TESTING SERVICE NA INC ET AL
as 3:2011cv00424
Plaintiff:
ISAAC SIMMONS
Defendant:
CAMATIC PTY LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BILL SALTER ADVERTISING INC v VALUE VINYLS INC
as 3:2011cv00396
Plaintiff:
BILL SALTER ADVERTISING INC
Defendant:
VALUE VINYL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
