US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Real Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 189
TEAGARDEN-HARD v. KONINKELIJKE NV et al
as 3:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Teagarden-Hard
Defendant:
Koninkelijke N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
THE CINCINNATI SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. MIELE, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv23795
Plaintiff:
THE CINCINNATI SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY other EGCD CONSTRUCTION, LLC other MATTHEW MCKAY other SHERRI MATTHEW doing business as ALYS BEACH CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Defendant:
MIELE, INC., BUILDER SPECIALTIES, INC., EUGSTER/FRISMAG AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ARD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23687
Plaintiff:
DENNIS ARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GOFF v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23447
Plaintiff:
REBECCA GOFF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23134
Plaintiff:
EDGARDO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRUZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23132
Plaintiff:
SCOTT CRUZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RODRIGUEZ v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23137
Plaintiff:
RADAMES RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VARGAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23138
Plaintiff:
CARLOS VARGAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VAZQUEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23139
Plaintiff:
ANGELO VAZQUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GINN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv20785
Plaintiff:
BOBBY M GINN, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
