D.C. Circuit Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,272
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC. v. DOE
as 1:2024cv02165
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
DAVIDSON v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY
as 1:2024cv01836
Plaintiff:
BRUCE CAMERON DAVIDSON
Defendant:
HOWARD UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
MURDOCK v. SCHEFFEL et al
as 1:2024cv01899
Plaintiff:
ZANE MURDOCK
Defendant:
DOWD SCHEFFEL and SAVILE INVESTMENTS PTY. LTD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. CAPITOL CONTOURS LLC
as 1:2024cv01781
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Defendant:
CAPITOL CONTOURS LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
JAH KENTE INTERNATIONAL INC. v. CARTER et al
as 1:2024cv01674
Plaintiff:
Jah Kente International Inc.
Defendant:
Jacqueline Carter and Iris McCollum Green
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127 Trademark Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC. v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01584
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC. v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01582
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC. v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01583
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
KANDI BAR, LLC v. SHENZHEN XIANGSHA NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. et al
as 1:2024cv01393
Plaintiff:
KANDI BAR, LLC
Defendant:
CHEN XIAOLI and SHENZHEN XIANGSHA NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
KANDI BAR, LLC v. WUHAN YIKENAN TRADING CO., LTD et al
as 1:2024cv01395
Plaintiff:
KANDI BAR, LLC
Defendant:
LUO DAN and WUHAN YIKENAN TRADING CO., LTD
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
