D.C. Circuit Other Statutes Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 19,957
WOLFF v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv00312
Plaintiff: MARC WOLFF
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
UNITED STATES
as 1:2017mc00406
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
CRUZ v. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE U.S.A.
as 1:2017cv00307
Plaintiff: ALEX CRUZ
Defendant: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
John Doe Company v. CFPB, et al
as 17-5026
Plaintiff - Appellant: John Doe Company
Defendant - Appellee: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Richard Cordray, in his official capacity as Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
PLUMMER v. CURRY
as 1:2017cv00301
Plaintiff: MONICA PLUMMER
Defendant: KEVIN CURRY
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
WILSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv00308
Plaintiff: TERESA WILSON , KYLE COOPER
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Nathanael Reynolds
as 17-7022
In Re - Petitioner: In re: Nathanael Lenard Reynolds
THOMPSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv00299
Plaintiff: LISA THOMPSON
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
PAYNE v. THE BRITISH EMBASSY, WASHINGTON, DC
as 1:2017cv00297
Defendant: THE BRITISH EMBASSY, WASHINGTON, DC
Plaintiff: SHELAGH PAYNE
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
DEAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv00298
Plaintiff: MELISSA DEAN
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?