D.C. Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,569
ELLIOT v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2024cv00893
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL (PCPC) and others
Plaintiff:
LORI BETH ELLIOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOLBROOK v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2024cv00896
Plaintiff:
DAWN HOLBROOK
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., LLT MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Teresita Canuto v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5068
Plaintiff:
Teresita A. Canuto
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and United States Attorney's Office
CHISLEY et al v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
BRYCE CHISLEY and APRIL COLE
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and DIAMOND TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC.
ROYALL v. HILLIARD et al
as 1:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Charles Monte Royall
Defendant:
ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC. DBA ECKERD CONNECTS and Carl Hilliard
Christopher Buie v. USA
as 24-5057
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Buie
Defendant:
United States of America
DAUGHERTY v. ARATA EXPOSITIONS, INC.
as 1:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Daugherty
Defendant:
ARATA EXPOSITIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JACKSON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
MELVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Michael Bullock v. Hana Security Services, et al
as 24-5055
Plaintiff:
Michael Bullock
Defendant:
Hana Security Services, Sam Estes, Regional Manager, Ronald Best, Contract Manager - IRS/DC and others
IANNAZZI et al v. AMAZON.COM, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
RITA IANNAZZI and GIANFRANCO MANCINI
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM INC., AMAZON.COM LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
