District of Columbia Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 180
ACKERMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv00722
Plaintiff:
PETER ACKERMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANACOSTIA BIBLE CHURCH
as 1:2008cv00685
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANACOSTIA BIBLE CHURCH
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SANDERS
as 1:2008cv00683
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HARRY SANDERS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
ACKERMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv00657
Plaintiff:
PETER ACKERMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
POLM FAMILY FOUNDATION, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00514
Plaintiff:
POLM FAMILY FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BENNETT-BEY v. STIFF
as 1:2008cv00328
Plaintiff:
TANYA BENNETT-BEY
Defendant:
LINDA STIFF
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ACKERMAN et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv00279
Plaintiff:
PETER ACKERMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
IVERSON v. COMMISSIONER INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2008cv00218
Plaintiff:
GERALD IVERSON, JR.
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
MCKEAN v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2007cv02202
Plaintiff:
JAY C. MCKEAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
WALLACE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2007cv01837
Plaintiff:
MARILYN WALLACE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
