Second Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 1,141
Odsvall v. Frank et al
as 1:2022cv05016
Plaintiff:
Fredrik Odsvall
Defendant:
Oren Frank, Mark Hirschhorn, Roni Frank and others
Nominal Defendant:
Talkspace, Inc. and Hudson Executive Investment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wester v. Bhatraju et al
as 1:2022cv05031
Plaintiff:
Zach Wester
Defendant:
Kiran Bhatraju, Ciara Burnham, Gregory Couch and others
Nominal Defendant:
AppHarvest, Inc.
The William B. Federman Irrevocable Trust v. Mather et al
as 1:2022cv04413
Plaintiff:
The William B. Federman Irrevocable Trust
Defendant:
Ann Mather, Whitney Wolfe-Herd, Pamela A. Thomas-Graham and others
Nominal Defendant:
Bumble Inc.
Fox v. First Horizon Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv03556
Plaintiff:
Robert Fox
Defendant:
First Horizon Corp., Harry V. Barton, Jr., Kenneth A. Burdick and others
Greenberg et al v. CDK Global, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03453
Defendant:
Stephen F. Schuckenbrock, CDK Global, Inc., Brian M. Krzanich and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Greenberg
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Leslie A. Brun
Gonzalez v. Kemp et. al
as 1:2022cv02401
Plaintiff:
Adonis Gonzalez
Defendant:
Astra Space Inc., Chris C. Kemp, Kelyn Brannon and others
Bernstein v. CDK Global, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03430
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Bernstein
Defendant:
CDK Global, Inc., Brian Krzanich, Leslie A. Brun and others
Alayev v. Kaikov et al
as 1:2022cv01609
Plaintiff:
Poulat Alayev
Defendant:
Arkady Kaikov, Zhenisbek Bakbergen, Andre Steckler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Ross v. Bhatraju et al
as 1:2022cv02037
Plaintiff:
Michael Ross
Defendant:
Kiran Bhatraju, Ciara Burnham, Gregory Couch and others
Lase Guaranty Trust v. Bammann et al
as 1:2022cv01331
Plaintiff:
Lase Guaranty Trust
Defendant:
Linda B Bammann, Stephen B Burke, Todd Anthony Combs and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
