Second Circuit Intellectual Property Cases

Patent Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 3,055
Profectus Technology LLC v. Meural, Inc.
as 1:2017cv09719
Plaintiff: Profectus Technology LLC
Defendant: Meural, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Test1 v. Test2
as 1:1957cv00001
Plaintiff: Test1
Defendant: Test2
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Trademark
Glo Science, Inc.
as 1:2017cv09533
Plaintiff: Glo Science, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Glo Science, Inc. v. Nanchang Dental Bright Technology Co., Ltd.
as 1:2017cv09326
Plaintiff: Glo Science, Inc.
Defendant: Nanchang Dental Bright Technology Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Lennon Image Technologies, LLC v. Coty Inc.
as 1:2017cv09146
Plaintiff: Lennon Image Technologies, LLC
Defendant: Coty Inc.
Mediator: Jeff Kaplan
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Kenall Manufacturing Company et al v. Clear-Vu Lighting LLC
as 1:2017cv09013
Plaintiff: Kenall Manufacturing Company , University of Strathclyde
Defendant: Clear-Vu Lighting LLC
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Zinganything, LLC et al v. Adjmi Apparel Group et al
as 1:2017cv08864
Plaintiff: Zinganything, LLC , Brighteye Innovations, LLC
Defendant: ADJMI Apparel Group, Innovative Fashion Group
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Holotouch, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
as 1:2017cv08717
Plaintiff: Holotouch, Inc.
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
20/20 Vision Center, LLC v. Vision Precision Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv08576
Plaintiff: 20/20 Vision Center, LLC
Defendant: Vision Precision Holdings, LLC, Stanton Optical Florida, LLC, T. Campen MD & Associates, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: Establishment of PTO
Bartonfalls LLC v. Armstrong Telephone Company
as 1:2017cv08596
Plaintiff: Bartonfalls LLC
Defendant: Armstrong Telephone Company
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?