New York Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,537
Corbin v. Bisignano
as 2:2025cv02679
Plaintiff:
Kenyetta Laboy Corbin
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Garner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00409
Plaintiff:
Taukeliah Garner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Meed v. King
as 1:2025cv02462
Plaintiff:
Michael Meed
Defendant:
Michelle King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Kuciel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00390
Plaintiff:
Diane L. Kuciel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ziembiec v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00377
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ziembiec
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Figueroa v. Commissioner Of Social Security
as 7:2025cv03390
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Figueroa
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security Of The United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Richardson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv03393
Plaintiff:
Abdul Richardson
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security Of The United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Oakes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv02237
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Oakes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Malik-Scott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv02661
Plaintiff:
Nasim Malik-Scot
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Edden v. Dudek
as 2:2025cv01425
Plaintiff:
Megan Kathleen Edden
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
