U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 171
Bill Overton v. USA
as 08-5352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILL MAX OVERTON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Whelco Industrial Ltd. v. USA/IRS
as 08-3154
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
WHELCO INDUSTRIAL LTD.
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Whelco Industrial Ltd. v. USA/IRS
as 08-3153
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
WHELCO INDUSTRIAL LTD.
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Carol Negron v. USA
as 07-4460
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAROL J. NEGRON, Executrix for the Estates of Mary A. Susteric and Mildred Lopatkovich
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Detroit Med Ctr
as 07-1602
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER
Amicus Curiae:
KENTUCKY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, MICHIGAN HEALTH AND HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, OHIO HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION and others
USA v. Detroit Med Ctr
as 07-1602
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER
Amicus Curiae:
KENTUCKY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, MICHIGAN HEALTH & HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, OHIO HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION and others
Alternative Enter v. USA
as 06-2596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALTERNATIVE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Hammon
as 06-4607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID L. HAMMON, SR.
Lewis v. USA
as 06-5959
Plaintiff:
THOMAS P. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (Internal Revenue Service)
Third Party - Appellant:
RONALD EDMONDS
Lewis v. USA
as 06-5957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS P. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (Internal Revenue Service)
Third Party:
RONALD EDMONDS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
