U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,411
Donald Strench v. Hyundai Motor America Corporation Service Company
as 24-3616
Plaintiff:
DONALD STRENCH
Defendant:
HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY
Qualitee Moshi v. Kia Motors America, Inc.
as 24-3609
Defendant:
KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff:
QUALITEE MOSHI, Administrator of the Estate on behalf of Matthew P Moshi
Robert Cox v. Total Quality Logistics, Inc., et al
as 24-3599
Defendant:
TOTAL QUALITY LOGISTICS, INC. and TOTAL QUALITY LOGISTICS, LLC
Plaintiff:
ROBERT COX, As duly appointed Personal Representative and Special Administrator of the Estate on behalf of Greta Cox
Joseph De Young v. Sweeney Julian Personal Injury Trial Attorneys, PC, et al
as 24-1551
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SCOTT DE YOUNG
Defendant:
SWEENEY JULIAN PERSONAL INJURY TRIAL ATTORNEYS, P.C., identified on initiating document as Sweeney. Julian PC and FRANKLIN D. JULIAN, JR.
Yaroslav Ilnytskyy v. Equipnet, Inc., et al
as 24-1502
Plaintiff:
YAROSLAV ILNYTSKYY
Defendant:
EQUIPNET, INC. and CSLIQ CORPORATION
Intervenor:
GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY
Dimitar Petlechkov v. Michael Stengel
as 24-5483
Plaintiff:
DIMITAR PETLECHKOV
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. STENGEL, dba Stengel Law Firm, P.C.
Brian White, Sr. v. Sushruth Shenava
as 24-1424
Defendant:
SUSHRUTH SHENAVA, Medical Doctor
Plaintiff:
BRIAN LAMOUNT WHITE, SR.
Ronald Emrit v. Sean Combs, et al
as 24-3405
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN COMBS, aka P. Diddy, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and ATLANTIC RECORDS CORP.
Naythan Ward, et al v. J.M. Smucker Company
as 24-3387
Plaintiff:
NAYTHAN A. WARD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JOE PISCIOTTI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CAMERON BOPP, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
J.M. SMUCKER COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
