Illinois Labor Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,764
Su v. Green Maintenance Services, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv03094
Plaintiff:
Acting Sec of Labor Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Green Maintenance Services, Inc and Jan Jarosz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Combs v. Doyle Land Services, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01111
Plaintiff:
Teresa Combs
Defendant:
Doyle Land Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Napolean et al v. Meltwater News US Inc.
as 1:2024cv02938
Plaintiff:
Robert Napolean and Eden Ezsak
Defendant:
Meltwater News US Inc.
O'Hagan et al v. Duck's Drive-In, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02892
Plaintiff:
Connor O'Hagan and Nicholas LaPuma
Defendant:
Duck's Drive-In, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Janson et al v. SAC Wireless, LLC
as 1:2024cv02687
Plaintiff:
Eric Janson, Cameron Jacklin and John Spray
Defendant:
SAC Wireless, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Duncan v. Platinum Choice Health Care, LLC
as 1:2024cv02648
Plaintiff:
Raesheena Duncan
Defendant:
Platinum Choice Health Care, LLC
Contractor v. Apex Home Health Care, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02431
Plaintiff:
Rupal Contractor
Defendant:
Apex Home Health Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Followell v. Plunkett's Pest Control, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02392
Plaintiff:
Brandon Followell
Defendant:
Plunkett's Pest Control, Inc. doing business as Varment Guard Wildlife Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Neisinger et al v. GT Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02397
Plaintiff:
Jason Neisinger and Nathanial Parker
Defendant:
GT Express, Inc. and Gheorghi Turcanu
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
