U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 363
USA v. Maggie Lin
as 14-56361
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAGGIE LIN
Bedrock Financial, Inc. v. USA, et al
as 14-16505
Plaintiff-counter-claim-defendant - Appellee:
BEDROCK FINANCIAL, INC., a California corporation
Defendant-counter-claim-3rd-party-plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Third-party-defendant:
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY, a California corporation and FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation
USA v. Cathy Hill
as 14-16333
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CATHY L. HILL, originally named as Cathy L Jordan
USA v. Cathy Hill
as 14-35590
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CATHY L. HILL, originally named as Cathy L Jordan
Bedrock Financial, Inc. v. USA, et al
as 14-16244
Plaintiff-counter-claim-defendant:
BEDROCK FINACIAL, INC., a California corporation
Defendant-counter-claim-3rd-party-plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Third-party-defendant - Appellant:
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY, a California corporation and FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation
USA v. John Hom
as 14-16214
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN C. HOM
USA v. Puyallup Tribe of Indian
as 14-35486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS
Charles Gragg, et al v. USA, et al
as 14-16053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES GRAGG and DELORES GRAGG
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE COMMISSIONER
USA v. Wen-Bing Soong
as 14-15987
Petitioner - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent - Appellant:
WEN-BING SOONG
USA v. Hsin-Jung Soong
as 14-15988
Petitioner - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent - Appellant:
HSIN-JUNG SHIRLEY SOONG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
