U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 107
SpinX Games, Ltd. v. Joshua Bennefield
as 23-15949
Petitioner / Appellant:
SPINX GAMES, LTD.
Respondent / Appellee:
JOSHUA BENNEFIELD
PhotoFixitPro, Inc. v. COSTCO
as 23-55548
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHOTOFIXITPRO, INC.
Respondent / Appellee:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
Vitaly Smagin v. Ashot Yegiazaryan
as 23-55524
Petitioner:
VITALY IVANOVICH SMAGIN
Respondent:
ASHOT YEGIAZARYAN, AKA Ashot Egiazaryan
Next Level Ventures, LLC v. Avid Holdings, Ltd.
as 23-35404
Petitioner:
NEXT LEVEL VENTURES, LLC, a Washington limited liability company
Respondent:
AVID HOLDINGS, LTD., a Hong Kong S.A.R. limited liability company, FKA Alderego Group, Ltd.
Beijing SouFun Science and Technology Development v. Yao Lin
as 23-55433
Petitioner:
BEIJING SOUFUN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD., a Peoples Republic of China corporation
Respondent:
YAO LIN, an individual
Equicare Health, Inc. v. Varian Medical Systems Incorporated
as 23-15698
Petitioner:
EQUICARE HEALTH, INC.
Respondent:
VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
Aniel Cruz Enriquez, et al v. Moke Espiritu, LLC, et al
as 23-55362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANIEL CRUZ ENRIQUEZ, an individual, GABRIEL SANTIAGO, an individual, LAURA ENRIQUEZ AGUILAR, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MOKE ESPIRITU, LLC, a California limited liability company
Defendant:
DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive
William Paynter v. UBS Financial Services, Inc., et al
as 23-15478
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM J. PAYNTER
Respondent / Appellee:
UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. and UBS CREDIT CORPORATION
Dyneka Collier v. 1940 Carmen LLC, et al
as 23-55283
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DYNEKA COLLIER, an individual
Defendant / Appellant:
1940 CARMEN LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, ALEXANDER G. STEIN, an individual and ESTHER STEIN, an individual
Defendant:
DOES, 1 through 25, inclusive
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
