U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 131
Teresa Turner v. Breathitt County Geriatric
as 15-6009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERESA HERALD TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
BREATHITT COUNTY GERIATRIC CORPORATION
Donna Tomazin v. Lincare, Inc., et al
as 15-5900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA TOMAZIN, as the surviving daughter of Ann Tomazin, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
LINCARE, INC. and AIRSEP CORP
Donna Tomazin v. Lincare, Inc., et al
as 15-5900
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONNA TOMAZIN, as the surviving daughter of Ann Tomazin, deceased
Defendant / Appellee:
LINCARE, INC. and AIRSEP CORP
Cindy Mitchell v. Sandoz Inc.
as 15-5675
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CINDY M. MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
SANDOZ INC.
Melson Bacos v. USA, et al
as 15-3640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELSON BACOS, Administrator of the Estate of Heather Nicole Bacos, deceased, and individually and on the behalf of the minor children, A.B. and J.B.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GARY J. CONNER, M.D., ANINDITA RAY, M.D. and others
George Mattfolk v. USA
as 14-2553
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE MATTFOLK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Emanual Cook v. Dennis Orr, et al
as 14-4200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMANUAL COOK, aka Emanuel Cook
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. DENNIS ORR and MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, F.C.I. Elkton
Larry Craigmyle v. U.S. Government
as 14-6392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY CRAIGMYLE
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. GOVERNMENT
Cindy Mitchell v. Sandoz Inc.
as 14-6171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MS. CINDY M. MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
SANDOZ INC.
Tracy Eiswert, et al v. USA
as 14-6125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACY LYNN REECE EISWERT, in her own right, as administratrix of the estate of Scott Walter Eiswert, deceased and on behalf of her minor children, U. E. and B. E. Eiswert and CHRISTINA REECE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
