US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
ANDERSON v. ONE SOUTH BANK
as 3:2012cv00440
Plaintiff:
DON ANDERSON
Defendant:
ONE SOUTH BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ANDERSON v. BROTHER'S J INC
as 3:2012cv00439
Plaintiff:
DON ANDERSON
Defendant:
BROTHER'S J INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ANDERSON v. PEOPLESSOUTH BANK INC
as 3:2012cv00438
Plaintiff:
DON ANDERSON
Defendant:
PEOPLESSOUTH BANK INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STEINBERG et al v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS A RECEIVER FOR PEOPLE'S FIRST COMMUNITY BANK
as 1:2010cv00236
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEINBERG , MIRIAM STEINBERG and PRESTIGE REALTY SERVICES INC
Defendant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS A RECEIVER FOR PEOPLE'S FIRST COMMUNITY BANK
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821
KATZ v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS A RECEIVER FOR PEOPLE'S FIRST COMMUNITY BANK
as 5:2010cv00274
Plaintiff:
DAVID KATZ
Defendant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS A RECEIVER FOR PEOPLE'S FIRST COMMUNITY BANK
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1464
PROFESSIONAL TITLE LLC et al v. THE BANK OF BONIFAY
as 5:2010cv00072
Plaintiff:
PROFESSIONAL TITLE LLC , MICHAEL HOWELL , MICHAEL AVIS and others
Defendant:
THE BANK OF BONIFAY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1971 Relief under Bank Holding Act
ALLAN v. CITI
as 5:2010cv00029
Plaintiff:
SHER L ALLAN
Defendant:
CITI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WIMBUSH v. FARMERS AND MERCHANT BANK et al
as 4:2008cv00435
Plaintiff:
CURTIS WIMBUSH, JR
Defendant:
FARMERS AND MERCHANT BANK and JOSEPH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RALLIS v. FIRST GULF BANK NA
as 3:2008cv00102
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOS RALLIS
Defendant:
FIRST GULF BANK NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TD BANKNORTH NA et al v. MCCARTY
as 4:2006cv00344
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
