US District Court for the Southern District of Florida Labor Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 1,245
QUINTANA v. MIAMI GARDENS DRIVE & 87TH AVENUE SUPERMARKET, INC.
as 1:2022cv22096
Plaintiff:
TOMAS QUINTANA
Defendant:
Miami Gardens Drive & 87th Avenue Supermarket, Inc. doing business as Sedano's Supermarket #36
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Del Carmen Tent v. Mexican Gastronomy International, LLC.
as 1:2022cv22101
Plaintiff:
MARIA DEL CARMEN TENT
Defendant:
MEXICAN GASTRONOMY INTERNATIONAL, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
FEIGE v. Burrows
as 1:2022cv22086
Plaintiff:
Mr. MAXIMILIAN FEIGE
Defendant:
Charlotte Burrows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DUARTE v. BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS LLC
as 1:2022cv21958
Plaintiff:
MARTHA DUARTE
Defendant:
Bellsouth Telecommunications LLC doing business as AT&T
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Wasiak v. KW Property Management & Consulting, LLC
as 1:2022cv21777
Plaintiff:
Dorota Wasiak
Defendant:
KW Property Management & Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Wasiak v. KW Property Management & Consulting, LLC
as 0:2022cv61103
Plaintiff:
Dorota Wasiak
Defendant:
KW Property Management & Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Wasiak v. KW PROPERTY MANAGEMENT & COUNSULTING, LLC
as 0:2022cv61094
Plaintiff:
Dorota Wasiak
Defendant:
KW PROPERTY MANAGEMENT & COUNSULTING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
wasiak v. KW PROPERTY MANAGEMENT & COUNSULTING, LLC
as 0:2022cv61077
Plaintiff:
dorota wasiak
Defendant:
KW PROPERTY MANAGEMENT & COUNSULTING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
United States Department of Labor v. Local 568, Transport Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO
as 1:2022cv21644
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Local 568, Transport Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
BRANDAO v. THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP LLC,
as 1:2022cv21641
Plaintiff:
ANDRE BRANDAO
Defendant:
THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP LLC., d/b/a NEIMAN-MARCUS, THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP LLC., doing business as NEIMAN-MARCUS and The Neiman Marcus Group, LLC. doing business as NEIMAN-MARCUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.