US District Court for the District of Hawaii Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 154
Patlidzanov et al v. Rollerblade USA LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00503
Plaintiff:
Ilia Patlidzanov and Darcie Patlidzanov
Defendant:
Rollerblade USA LLC , The Sports Authority, Inc. and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanley v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00273
Plaintiff:
Richard Stanley
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dalley v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00276
Plaintiff:
David N. Dalley
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ilae v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00274
Plaintiff:
Roxy Ilae
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos et al v. Actavis South Atlantic, LLC. et al
as 1:2011cv00146
Plaintiff:
David Ernest Ramos, Sr. , K. R. and Sundra Ornellas
Defendant:
Actavis South Atlantic, LLC. , Actavis, Inc. , Corium International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Landry v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00097
Plaintiff:
Eugene Landry
Defendant:
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bachrach-Prober et al v. SpeediShuttle, LLC
as 1:2011cv00072
Plaintiff:
Laura Bachrach-Prober and Charles G. Prober
Defendant:
SpeediShuttle, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lum v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00624
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Lum
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chedester v. Actavis Group et al
as 1:2010cv00327
Plaintiff:
Ralph Chedester
Defendant:
Actavis Group, Actavis Totowa, LLC , Mylan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bryan Cabbat vs. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00162
Plaintiff:
Bryan Cabbat
Defendant:
Philip Morris USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
