US District Court for the District of Idaho Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 301
Ankeny v. The Home Depot USA, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00518
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ankeny
Defendant:
The Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glenn et al v. B&R Plastics, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00508
Plaintiff:
William Glenn and Shirley Glenn
Defendant:
B&R Plastics, Inc. and John Does I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heiss v. Stryker Howmedica Osteonics Corp
as 1:2016cv00445
Plaintiff:
Robert Heiss
Defendant:
Stryker Howmedica Osteonics Corp and John/Jane Does I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00344
Plaintiff:
Dave R Davis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Wilks Funeral Home, LLC v. SimplexGrinnell LP
as 4:2016cv00103
Plaintiff:
Wilks Funeral Home, LLC
Defendant:
SimplexGrinnell LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newman et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00033
Plaintiff:
Ariel Newman and Tiras Newman
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. , Depuy, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andersen v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2015cv00567
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andersen
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scheid v. Coloplast Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv00564
Plaintiff:
Colleen Scheid
Defendant:
Coloplast Corporation , Coloplast A/S, Coloplast Manufacturing, US, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00508
Plaintiff:
Deana Brown
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richardson et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00443
Plaintiff:
Brian Richardson and Susan Richardson
Defendant:
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Conceptus, Inc. , Essure and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
