US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 80
Design Ideas Ltd v. Meijer Inc
as 3:2007cv03107
Plaintiff:
Design Ideas Ltd, Design Ideas Ltd, Design Ideas Ltd and others
Defendant:
Meijer Inc, Meijer Inc, Meijer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Design Ideas, Ltd v. Things Remembered Inc
as 3:2007cv03077
Plaintiff:
Design Ideas, Ltd, Design Ideas, Ltd, Design Ideas, Ltd and others
Defendant:
Things Remembered Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Tate & Lyle Technology Limited et al v. AIDP Inc et al
as 2:2007cv02050
Plaintiff:
Tate & Lyle Technology Limited, Tate & Lyle Technology Limited, Tate & Lyle Technology Limited and others
Defendant:
Beijing Forbest Chemical Co Ltd, Beijing Forbest Chemical Co Ltd, Beijing Forbest Chemical Co Ltd and others
Counter Claimant:
US Niutang Chemical Inc
Counter Defendant:
Tate & Lyle Technology Limited and Tate & Lyle Sucralose Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Turkey Scope, LLC v. Jennie-O Turkey Store, Inc
as 1:2006cv01282
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Maui Jim, Inc. v. Dynamic Technology Software, Inc.
as 1:2006cv01168
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Maui Jim, Inc. v. Bargain Depot Enterprises, LLC
as 1:2006cv01169
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Maui Jim, Inc. v. NYS Collection, LLC
as 1:2006cv01170
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Tate & Lyle Sucralose Inc v. Hebei Sukeri Science and Technology Co Ltd et al
as 2:2006cv02102
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
The GSI Group Inc v. Sukup Manufacturing Co
as 3:2005cv03011
Plaintiff:
The GSI Group Inc
Defendant:
Sukup Manufacturing Co
Counter_claimant:
Sukup Manufacturing Co
Counter_defendant:
The GSI Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
