US District Court for the Western District of New York Labor Cases

Labor/Management Relations Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 81 - 90 of 134
Cement Masons' Local Union No. 111 of the Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association of the United States and Canada, et al., v. Oliver Blacktop
as 1:2009cv00798
Plaintiff: Cement Masons' Local Union No. 111 of the Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association of the United States and Canada, Cement Masons' Local Union No. 111 of the Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association of the United States and Canada, Angelo Massaro and others
Defendant: Oliver Blacktop
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Labor None
International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental, and Reinforcing Iron Workers, Local 6, et al v. Patton et al
as 1:2009cv00533
Plaintiff: International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental, and Reinforcing Iron Workers, Local 6,, Willaim Bohen, Thomas J. Halligan and others
Defendant: Vaughan Door Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Labor None
Infinity Glass and Restoration, LLC v. Laborers' International Union of North America, Local #210 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00460
Plaintiff: Infinity Glass and Restoration, LLC and Infinity Glass and Restoration, LLC
Defendant: Laborers' International Union of North America, Local #210
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Type: Labor None
Mascaro Construction Co., L.P. v. Local Union No. 210, Laborers International Union of North America, AFL-CIO We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00427
Petitioner: Mascaro Construction Co., L.P., Mascaro Construction Co., L.P. and Mascaro Construction Co., L.P.
Respondent: Local Union No. 210, Laborers International Union of North America, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Type: Labor None
Ley v. Empire State Weeklies, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00189
Plaintiff: Rhonda P. Ley
Defendant: Empire State Weeklies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Labor None
Truck Drivers Local Union No. 449 International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Oakgrove Construction, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00163
Plaintiff: Truck Drivers Local Union No. 449 International Brotherhood of Teamsters and Truck Drivers Local Union No. 449 International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Defendant: Oakgrove Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
Laborers International Union of North America, Local No. 210, AFL-CIO v. H&M Plumbing and Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00956
Plaintiff: Laborers International Union of North America, Local No. 210, AFL-CIO
Defendant: H&M Plumbing and Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
Teamsters Local Union No. 529
as 6:2008cv06532
Plaintiff: Teamsters Local Union No. 529
Defendant: First Transit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
LCA Development, Inc. v. Truck Drivers Local Union NO. 449 Affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters et al
as 1:2008cv00849
Plaintiff: LCA Development, Inc.
Defendant: Truck Drivers Local Union NO. 449 Affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and George E. Harrigan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff
United Association of Journeyman & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry of the U.S. and Canada, Local 22 et al v. Praxair, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00790
Plaintiff: United Association of Journeyman & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry of the U.S. and Canada, Local 22, International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 463, Laborers International Union of North America, Local 91 and others
Defendant: Praxair, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?