US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Stanley Filter Co., LLC v. Wingmaster Sales, LLC
as 4:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
Stanley Filter Co., LLC
Defendant:
Wingmaster Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
JNK Holdings LLC v. Te Kei's LLC
as 4:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
JNK Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Te Kei's LLC
Counter_claimant:
Te Kei's LLC
Counter_defendant:
JNK Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
WPX Energy, Inc. v. Wild West Domains, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00617
Plaintiff:
WPX Energy, Inc.
Defendant:
Wild West Domains, LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
WPX Energy, Inc. v. Wild West Domains, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00610
Plaintiff:
WPX Energy, Inc.
Defendant:
Wild West Domains, LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Vintage Market Days, LLC v. Waltman
as 4:2016cv00603
Plaintiff:
Vintage Market Days, LLC
Defendant:
Paula Waltman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
WPX Energy, Inc. v. John Doe
as 4:2016cv00581
Plaintiff:
WPX Energy, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Business Development Authority v. Rocket Games, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00140
Plaintiff:
Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Business Development Authority
Defendant:
Rocket Games, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Parker Pest Control, Inc. v. Power Pest Control Services, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00702
Plaintiff:
Parker Pest Control, Inc.
Defendant:
Power Pest Control Services, LLC, James Roberts and Robert Diamond
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Enovation Controls, LLC v. EmeraChem LLC
as 4:2015cv00632
Plaintiff:
Enovation Controls, LLC
Defendant:
EmeraChem LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Baker Hughes, Incorporated v. Summit ESP, LLC
as 4:2015cv00484
Plaintiff:
Baker Hughes, Incorporated
Defendant:
Summit ESP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
