US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Retail Liquor Association of Oklahoma et al v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement Commission et al
as 5:2017cv00049
Plaintiff:
Retail Liquor Association of Oklahoma and Joseph P Richard
Defendant:
Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement Commission and Keith A Burt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fontenot v. Pruitt
as 5:2016cv01339
Plaintiff:
Peggy Fontenot
Defendant:
E Scott Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lyons-Lee v. Chang
as 5:2016cv01277
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Lyons-Lee
Defendant:
Hank Chang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pottawatomie County Rural Water District No 3 v. Fallin et al
as 5:2016cv00659
Plaintiff:
Pottawatomie County Rural Water District No 3
Defendant:
Mary Fallin and J David Burrage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De La Fuente v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2016cv00583
Plaintiff:
Roque De La Fuente
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Does and Paul Ziriax
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carney v. Oklahoma Department of Public Safety
as 5:2016cv00484
Plaintiff:
Ray Neal Carney
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Berryhill v. Pruitt
as 5:2014cv00605
Petitioner:
Lavern Berryhill
Respondent:
Scott Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Lockett et al v. Evans et al
as 5:2014cv00197
Plaintiff:
Clayton Lockett and Charles Frederick Warner
Defendant:
Edward Evans and Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Valley Ditch Witch Inc v The Charles Machine Works Inc
as 5:2013cv01272
Plaintiff:
Valley Ditch Witch Inc
Defendant:
Charles Machine Works Inc The
Overflow Energy LLC v. Roger Mills County Board of County Commissioners
as 5:2013cv01136
Plaintiff:
Overflow Energy LLC
Defendant:
Roger Mills County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
