Delaware Other Statutes Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 1,741
Hutchinson v. Russell et al
as 1:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
David Hutchinson
Defendant:
Austin Russell, Mike McAuliffe, Alec E. Gores and others
Nominal Defendant:
Luminar Technologies, Inc.
Bhavsar et al v. Fulop et al
as 1:2023cv01339
Plaintiff:
Denish Bhavsar and Samhita Gera
Defendant:
Ric Fulop, James Haley, Ali El Siblani and others
Nominal Defendant:
Desktop Metal, Inc.
Williams v. Neoleukin Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01306
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Neoleukin Therapeutics, Inc., Martin Babler, M. Cantey Boyd and others
Dechant et al v. Gores et al
as 1:2023cv01318
Plaintiff:
Lance Dechant and William Voges
Defendant:
Alec E. Gores, Jun Hong Heng, Mary Lou Jepsen and others
Nominal Defendant:
Luminar Technologies, Inc.
O'Neill v. Neoleukin Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01310
Plaintiff:
James O'Neill
Defendant:
Neoleukin Therapeutics, Inc., Martin Babler, M. Cantey Boyd and others
Woodford Eurasia Assets Ltd. et al v. Lottery.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01317
Plaintiff:
Woodford Eurasia Assets Ltd., MC Holdings Group, LLC, ALD Holdings Group, LLC and others
Defendant:
Lottery.com, Inc., Matthew McGahan, Barney Battles and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Miller v. Miromatrix Medical Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01300
Plaintiff:
Eric Miller
Defendant:
Miromatrix Medical Inc., Paul Buckman, William Burke and others
Williams v. Miromatrix Medical Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01301
Plaintiff:
Kyle Williams
Defendant:
Miromatrix Medical Inc., Paul Buckman, William Burke and others
Walsh v. PCTEL, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01294
Plaintiff:
Ryan Walsh
Defendant:
PCTEL, Inc., M. Jay Sinder, Cindy Andreotti and others
Wilhelm v. Mirati Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01298
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Mirati Therapeutics, Inc., Faheem Hasnain, Charles Baum and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
