Delaware Labor Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Artis et al v. Marshall et al
as 1:2016cv00790
Plaintiff:
Dennis Artis , Donna A. Lindsay and Patricia Marshall
Defendant:
ITT Educational Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Federman et al v. ITT Educational Services, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00780
Plaintiff:
Allen Federman and Steve Ryan
Defendant:
ITT Educational Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104
Julius Cephas et al v. International Longshoremen's Association et al
as 1:2016cv00316
Plaintiff:
Julius Cephas , Paul Cutler , Emmett Foster and others
Defendant:
International Longshoremen's Association , Harold J. Daggett , William Ashe, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Allen v. PCH Communications, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00083
Plaintiff:
Erik Allen
Defendant:
PCH Communications, LLC and PCH Holdings Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104
Posner v. Bayhealth Medical Center
as 1:2015cv01149
Petitioner:
Charles Posner
Respondent:
Bayhealth Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Martin v. Zirtual Inc.
as 1:2015cv00701
Plaintiff:
Felice Martin
Defendant:
Zirtual Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104
Olivier v. Univita Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00671
Plaintiff:
Omar M. Olivier
Defendant:
Univita Health, Inc. and Univita of Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104
Getz v. Dunning et al
as 1:2015cv00567
Plaintiff:
Dayna Getz
Defendant:
Christine Dunning, Stephen Davis and Elizabeth Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EI DuPont De Nemours and Company v. Boeger
as 1:2015cv00364
Plaintiff:
EI DuPont De Nemours and Company
Defendant:
Brian Boeger
Counter_claimant:
Brian Boeger
Counter_defendant:
EI DuPont De Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company v. Boeger
as 1:2015cv00359
Plaintiff:
E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company
Defendant:
Brian Boeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
