District of Columbia Contract Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 1,692
EPSTEIN, BECKER & GREEN, P.C. v. PRINCETON HOLDINGS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 1:2022cv02920
Plaintiff:
EPSTEIN, BECKER & GREEN, P.C.
Defendant:
PRINCETON HOLDINGS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
PDR RESOURCES, INC. v. TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY DEMOCRATS
as 1:2022cv02827
Plaintiff:
PDR RESOURCES, INC.
Defendant:
TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY DEMOCRATS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HAYDOUTOVA et al v. CITIBANK, N.A.
as 1:2022cv02662
Plaintiff:
JULIANA HAYDOUTOVA and Metody Tilev
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
SANGOH v. EMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIC OF IRAQ
as 1:2022cv02621
Plaintiff:
TAKAKO SANGOH
Defendant:
EMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIC OF IRAQ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
ALTARUM INSTITUTE v. MALONEY
as 1:2022cv02574
Plaintiff:
ALTARUM INSTITUTE
Defendant:
ELIZABETH MALONEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
EKOPEL D.O.O. v. CITIBANK N.A. et al
as 1:2022cv02554
Defendant:
CITIBANK N.A., CITIGROUP, CITI and others
Plaintiff:
EKOPEL D.O.O.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
JUNG v. WELLS FARGO BANK
as 1:2022cv02513
Plaintiff:
MAY T. JUNG
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv02511
Plaintiff:
MAY T. JUNG and NO PARTY
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
AENERGY, S.A. v. REPUBLIC OF ANGOLA et al
as 1:2022cv02514
Plaintiff:
AENERGY, S.A.
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF ANGOLA, MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND WATER OF THE REPUBLIC OF ANGOLA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ANGOLA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv02502
Plaintiff:
BRUNO K. MPOY and NO PARTY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
