District of Columbia Intellectual Property Cases

Patent Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 91 - 100 of 313
ZHEJIANG MEDICINE CO., LTD. et al v. KANEKA CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv00587
Plaintiff: ZHEJIANG MEDICINE CO., LTD. and ZMC-USA L.L.C.
Defendant: KANEKA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC. et al v. KAPPOS
as 1:2011cv00516
Plaintiff: HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC. and MORPHOSYS AG
Defendant: DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
TELES AG et al v. KAPPOS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00476
Plaintiff: TELES AG and SIGRAM SCHINDLER BETEILIGUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Defendant: DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
SCHERING CORPORATION et al v. KAPPOS
as 1:2011cv00457
Plaintiff: SCHERING CORPORATION and MERCK & CO., INC.
Defendant: DAVID KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
H. LUNDBECK A/S v. KAPPOS
as 1:2011cv00233
Plaintiff: H. LUNDBECK A/S
Defendant: DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
SYNGENTA SEEDS, INC. v. BAYER S.A.S.
as 1:2011cv00280
Plaintiff: SYNGENTA SEEDS, INC.
Defendant: BAYER S.A.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
POTTER v. TOEI ANIMATION INCORPORATED et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02085
Plaintiff: ISAAC A. POTTER, JR.
Defendant: TOEI ANIMATION INCORPORATED and UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv02031
Plaintiff: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant: DAVID KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. GRAFF/ROSS HOLDINGS LLP We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01948
Plaintiff: FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Defendant: GRAFF/ROSS HOLDINGS LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
BOBEL v. TELE-CONS, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv01913
Plaintiff: ANDRZEJ BOBEL
Defendant: TELE-CONS, INC. and MICHAEL MOISIN
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?