U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida Contract Cases

Miller Act Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 232
W.W. Gay Fire & Integrated Systems, Inc. v. AEM Services, LLC et al
as 3:2025cv00002
Plaintiff: W.W. Gay Fire & Integrated Systems, Inc.
Defendant: AEM Services, LLC and Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America for the use of MCS of Tampa, Inc. v. Sauer Construction, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01096
Defendant: FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Sauer Construction, LLC
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the use of MCS of Tampa, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America for the use and benefit of Islands Mechanical Contractor, Inc. v. Environmental Chemical Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv01039
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the use and benefit of Islands Mechanical Contractor, Inc.
Defendant: Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company and Environmental Chemical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America for the use and benefit of Islands Mechanical Contractor, Inc. v. Environmental Chemical Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv01040
Defendant: Aspen American Insurance Company and Environmental Chemical Corporation
Petitioner: The United States of America for the use and benefit of Islands Mechanical Contractor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America f/u/b Intergrated Construction Management, Inc. v. Westport Insurance Corporation
as 8:2024cv01642
Defendant: Westport Insurance Corporation
Plaintiff: The United States of America f/u/b Intergrated Construction Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract Miller Act
Intergrated Construction Management, Inc. v. Westport Insurance Corporation
as 8:2024cv01643
Defendant: Westport Insurance Corporation
Plaintiff: Intergrated Construction Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America for the use and benefit of STOA International/Florida, Inc. v. Brantley Construction Services, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00573
Defendant: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Brantley Construction Services, LLC
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the use and benefit of STOA International/Florida, Inc. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as STOA Architects
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use and benefit of High Point Electric & Fire, LLC et al v. Up-Side Management Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00158
Plaintiff: High Point Electric & Fire, LLC, High Point Concrete & Civil, LLC, The United States of America, for the use and benefit of High Point Electric & Fire, LLC and others
Defendant: Up-Side Management Company, On-Point Risk Solutions, Inc. and Aegis Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc. v. Up-Side Management Company, Inc., et al
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff: The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc.
Defendant: Up-Side Management Company, Inc. and Aegis Security Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
Intergrated Construction Management, Inc. v. Wolverine Fire Protection, Co., et al
as 6:2024cv00137
Plaintiff: Intergrated Construction Management, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Mr. Edward J. Kinberg and The United States of America
Defendant: Wolverine Fire Protection, Co., a Michigan corporation, Great American Insurance Company, an Ohio corporation, Wolverine Fire Protection, Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?