U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 521
DUBOSE v. WAFFLE HOUSE INC
as 3:2025cv00259
Plaintiff:
MARCIE DUBOSE
Defendant:
WAFFLE HOUSE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
HODGE et al v. PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2025cv00246
Plaintiff:
Dennis Anthony Hodge and Alexandria Sarah Garrett
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
ROBLES v. VASQUEZ et al
as 1:2025cv00069
Plaintiff:
Sachalys Robles
Defendant:
Gualberto Vasquez and RXO Express, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
HALMAGHI v. TIBBS
as 3:2025cv00187
Plaintiff:
Brian Halmaghi
Defendant:
Robert E Tibbs, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2025cv00080
Plaintiff:
MARY ANN JACKSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
JJF v. ROBERTS et al
as 3:2025cv00077
Plaintiff:
J. J. F.
Defendant:
Jason Trevor Roberts and Amy Jo Roberts
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
HODGSON v. NEEL et al
as 3:2025cv00072
Plaintiff:
SUN HODGSON
Defendant:
RONALD NEEL and BALDWIN TRUSS COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
HODGSON v. NEEL et al
as 3:2025cv00074
Plaintiff:
JOHN HODGSON
Defendant:
RONALD NEEL and BALDWIN TRUSS COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
ALCANTAR v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2025cv00075
Plaintiff:
JASMINE ALCANTAR
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
BECKS v. PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2025cv00035
Plaintiff:
Lisa M Becks
Defendant:
Progressive Select Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
