Southern District of Florida Intellectual Property Cases

Trademark Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 2,235
Evans et al v. Andy & Evan Industries, Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv61012
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
ABS-CBN CORPORATION et al v. freepinoychannel.com et al
as 0:2015cv61002
Plaintiff: ABS-CBN CORPORATION , ABS-CBN FILM PRODUCTIONS, INC. , ABS-CBN INTERNATIONAL COROPORATION
Defendant: freepinoychannel.com, lambingan.to, pinoymovie.to and others
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Evans et al v. Andy & Evan Industries, Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv61013
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Thirty-Eight Street, Inc. et al v. Irwin et al
as 0:2015cv60997
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Michael Kors, L.L.C. v. 2014michaelkorsonsale.com et al
as 0:2015cv60998
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Gucci America, Inc. v. 2015gucci-outlet.com et al
as 0:2015cv60969
Plaintiff: Gucci America, Inc.
Defendant: 2015gucci-outlet.com, 2015luxurytopbags.com, africalegalaid.org and others
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Gucci America, Inc. v. 6abag.net et al
as 0:2015cv60959
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Baptist Health South Florida, Inc. v. Leal Medical Center, LLC
as 1:2015cv21725
Plaintiff: Baptist Health South Florida, Inc.
Defendant: Leal Medical Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Chanel, Inc. v. 2015 fashion accessories et al
as 0:2015cv60924
Plaintiff: Chanel, Inc.
Defendant: 2015 fashion accessories, 2015and 518, fancy online and others
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Airtex Products, LP v. Global Automotive of Miami, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv21613
Plaintiff: Airtex Products, LP
Defendant: Global Automotive of Miami, Inc., Kevin Lee Simmons
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.