US District Court for the Southern District of Florida Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 4,837
NEPA WHOLESALE, INC. v. SAFA GOODS, LLC
as 1:2023cv24247
Plaintiff:
NEPA WHOLESALE, INC., a Florida Corporation and NEPA WHOLESALE, INC.
Defendant:
SAFA GOODS, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company and SAFA GOODS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Nu Life Institute, Inc. v. New Life Rejuvenation, LLC. et al
as 1:2023cv24215
Plaintiff:
Nu Life Institute, Inc.
Defendant:
New Life Rejuvenation, LLC. and William Stephanos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Peleg Design LTD v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 0:2023cv62107
Plaintiff:
Peleg Design Ltd. and Peleg Design LTD
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, ChangZhengY (1), KgsafO (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Peleg Design Ltd. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations on Schedule A
as 0:2023cv62106
Plaintiff:
Peleg Design Ltd.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Louis Vuitton Malletier v. The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 0:2023cv62099
Plaintiff:
Louis Vuitton Malletier
Defendant:
The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations and The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Chanel, Inc. v. afamouschallenge.com et al
as 0:2023cv62085
Defendant:
lavesti.com, afamouschallenge.com, eastlisa.com and others
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Tangle Inc. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 0:2023cv62094
Plaintiff:
Tangle Inc.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Apple Corps Limited et al v. The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 0:2023cv62075
Plaintiff:
Apple Corps Limited and Subafilms Limited
Defendant:
The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, gannashirts.com, ghosttshirt.com and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Gaffigan et al v. The Individual, Business Entity, or Unincorporated Association operating the domain names, stephenmgaffiganpa.com and attorneystephenmgaffiganpa.com et al
as 0:2023cv62077
Plaintiff:
Stephen M. Gaffigan and Stephen M. Gaffigan, P.A.
Defendant:
The Individual, Business Entity, or Unincorporated Association operating the domain names, stephenmgaffiganpa.com and attorneystephenmgaffiganpa.com and The Individual, Business Entity, or Unincorporated Association operating under the Facebook social media identity, Stephen M. Gaffigan PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Richemont International SA et al v. The Individuals, Business Entities, And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
as 0:2023cv62064
Plaintiff:
Richemont International SA, Azzedine Alaa SAS, Cartier International A.G. and others
Defendant:
The Individuals, Business Entities, And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
