Florida Contract Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 17,715
MB Aviation LLC v. HCC Capital, LP
as 0:2024cv60536
Plaintiff:
MB Aviation LLC
Defendant:
HCC Capital, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Primeflight Aviation Services, Inc. v. Fenix Logistix, Inc.
as 0:2024cv60546
Plaintiff:
Primeflight Aviation Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Fenix Logistix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dailey v. South State Bank, N.A.
as 8:2024cv00846
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dailey
Defendant:
South State Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Goolsby et al v. Wanabana LLC et al
as 1:2024cv21249
Plaintiff:
Eric Goolsby and Heather Goolsby
Defendant:
Wanabana LLC and Wanabana USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Newlon, Esq. v. South State Bank, N.A.
as 8:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
NICOLE NEWLON
Defendant:
South State Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clark v. South State Bank N.A.
as 8:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
Suzann Clark
Defendant:
South State Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
UpEquity SPV1, LLC v. Bigley et al
as 3:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
UpEquity SPV1, LLC
Defendant:
Robert Bigley and Cindy Lou Bigley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
UpEquity SPV1, LLC v. Glennon
as 8:2024cv00842
Plaintiff:
UpEquity SPV1, LLC
Defendant:
Meagan Glennon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Angelle v. GardaWorld CashLINK LLC
as 9:2024cv80403
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Angelle
Defendant:
GardaWorld CashLINK LLC doing business as GardaWorld Cash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Faberman v. JETSET AUTOMOTIVE LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80405
Plaintiff:
Ronald Faberman
Defendant:
JETSET AUTOMOTIVE LLC and DUFFY'S CLASSIC CARS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
