Florida Contract Cases
Cases 3,921 - 3,930 of 50,542
US Thrillrides, LLC et al v. Intamin Amusement Rides Int. Corp. Est.
as 6:2022cv02338
Plaintiff:
us thrillrides, LLC and Polercoaster, LLC
Defendant:
intamin amusement rides Int. Corp. Est.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
HOLZWORTH et al v. CLEAR BLUE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24922
Plaintiff:
Matthew Holzworth and Dawn Holzworth
Defendant:
CLEAR BLUE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Lee et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 6:2022cv02331
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee and Deena Vance
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Fineman et al v. Ferragamo USA Inc. et al
as 9:2022cv81923
Plaintiff:
Scott Fineman, Mohammed Waqas Malik, Cristian Silva and others
Defendant:
Ferragamo USA Inc., S-Fer International Incorporated, Sator Realty Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Truist Bank v. M/Y Family Time
as 1:2022cv24064
Plaintiff:
TRUIST BANK
Defendant:
M/Y FAMILY TIME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
1000 Biscayne Tower, LLC v. ACE American Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv24058
Plaintiff:
1000 Biscayne Tower, LLC
Defendant:
ACE American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Rojas-Gotay et al v. Clear Blue Insurance Company
as 6:2022cv02320
Plaintiff:
LAURA ROJAS-GOTAY and MARIA GONZALEZ-GOTAY
Defendant:
CLEAR BLUE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Coral Oaks Tennis & Wellness, LLC v. MT. Hawley Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv24042
Plaintiff:
Coral Oaks Tennis & Wellness, LLC
Defendant:
MT. Hawley Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Chase v. Jomashop, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00794
Plaintiff:
Derek Chase
Defendant:
Jomashop, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
