U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 962
McGuin v. Dudek
as 2:2025cv00126
Plaintiff:
Ronald Collin McGuin
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00114
Plaintiff:
Ginger Diane Gonzalez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Quattrocchi v. Dudek
as 2:2025cv00088
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Quattrocchi
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Studley et al
as 1:2025cv00071
Plaintiff:
Lauren Kyle Studley and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Peterson v. Colvin
as 1:2025cv00049
Plaintiff:
Gina Peterson
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rice v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00039
Plaintiff:
Roberta J. Rice
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Logston v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00033
Petitioner:
Katelynn Renee Logston
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Richardson v. Colvin
as 1:2025cv00018
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Dustin Shane Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hujus-Strait v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv00016
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ann Hujus-Strait
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Buell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jordan Nicole Buell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
