Idaho Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 301
Leavitt v. Merck & Co., Inc
as 2:2011cv00056
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc
Plaintiff:
Judith Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leavitt v. Merck & Co., Inc
as 4:2011cv00056
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc
Plaintiff:
Judith Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fellows v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jon Fellows
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stevenson v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc.
as 4:2010cv00607
Plaintiff:
Brent Stevenson
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives Inc and Zicam LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blumhorst v. Pierce Manufacturing Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00573
Plaintiff:
Ervin E Blumhorst
Defendant:
Pierce Manufacturing Inc. and Akron Brass Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hine et al v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc, et al
as 1:2010cv00564
Plaintiff:
Charlene M. Hine
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives, Inc and Zicam LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schrock et al v. Isuzu Motors Limited et al
as 4:2010cv00521
Plaintiff:
Stacy Schrock , Christina Monroe , Laurel Monroe and others
Defendant:
Isuzu Motors Limited, Isuzu North America Corporation, Isuzu Motors America, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlson v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. f/k/a Gumtech International, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00489
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Carlson
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. f/k/a Gumtech International, Inc. and Zicam LLC, f/k/a Gel Tech, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlson v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00489
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Carlson
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives Inc and Zicam LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bain v. Pfizer Inc.
as 3:2010cv00409
Plaintiff:
Mary Irene Bain
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
