U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 234
Poor v. United States of America
as 1:2025cv01085
Plaintiff:
Rachel Poor
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Walker v. Darden et al
as 2:2025cv02036
Plaintiff:
Andreas S Walker
Defendant:
Ricky R. Darden and DDC Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Burke v. MBR Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv01052
Plaintiff:
Margaret A Burke
Defendant:
MBR Transport, Inc. and Bronislaw Rudny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Ard v Allbright Farms LLC et al
as 2:2025cv02031
Plaintiff:
Estate of Billy B. Shirley, by Tiffany S. Ard, Personal Representative
Defendant:
Allbright Farms, LLC and Troy W. Lunsford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bohn v. Ibrahim et al
as 1:2025cv01036
Plaintiff:
Jacob Bohn
Defendant:
Abdi H Ibrahim and Maaz Express, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Notice of Removal
Crum v. McBride
as 3:2025cv03017
Plaintiff:
Tina Crum
Defendant:
Verna McBride
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Abdul-Sater v. Gardner et al
as 1:2024cv01393
Defendant:
Northland Insurance Company and Patti Lynn Gardner
Plaintiff:
MOHAMAD ABDUL-SATER
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Dickerson v. Caterpillar Inc et al
as 1:2024cv01449
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc and Emma Richardson
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Hartsell v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02247
Plaintiff:
Tia Hartsell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Raddatz v. XPO Logistics Freight Inc
as 2:2024cv02237
Plaintiff:
Lee Raddatz
Defendant:
XPO Logistics Freight Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
