US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 241 - 250 of 334
Gore v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
as 3:2011cv03122
Plaintiff:
Kathy D. Gore
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Owens v. Invacare Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv04032
Plaintiff:
Patricia J. Owens
Defendant:
Invacare Corporation and Apria Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fangmeier v. Wright-Medical Technology, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01160
Plaintiff:
Marvin Fangmeier
Defendant:
Wright-Medical Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Durdel v. Medtronic Inc
as 1:2011cv01140
Plaintiff:
Frederick Durdel
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palmer v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02087
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Palmer
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc , Depuy Orthopedics Inc and Depuy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ray v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2011cv02086
Plaintiff:
Marsha Ray
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Depuy Orthopaedics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hilgers-Luckey et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02072
Plaintiff:
Erika Hilgers-Luckey , James . Williams , Martha Bing and others
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc , Depuy Inc , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Turner et al v Summit Treestands, LLC
as 3:2011cv03053
Plaintiff:
Clinton Turner and Kimberly Turner
Defendant:
Summit Treestands, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2010cv03338
Plaintiff:
Ruriko Murray
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. , Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reynolds v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2010cv01364
Plaintiff:
Randy Reynolds
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
